Mount Pleasant, South Carolina · deed record as of August 25, 2026
The Seven
The neighborhoods this Index keeps — 3,481 homes, matched parcel by parcel to the Charleston County deed record.
The seven neighborhoods
Snee Farm
29464 · Built 1971–89
- Doors
- 1,081
- Owner-occ
- 86.5%
- For sale
- 24
See the record →
Brickyard Plantation
29466 · Built 1992–07
- Doors
- 821
- Owner-occ
- 92.7%
- For sale
- 6
See the record →
Hamlin Plantation
29466 · Built 2000–17
- Doors
- 857
- Owner-occ
- 90.8%
- For sale
- 12
See the record →
Oyster Point
29466 · Built 2013–20
- Doors
- 542
- Owner-occ
- 82.8%
- For sale
- 4
See the record →
Moore's Landing
29466 · Built 2021–23
- Doors
- 55
- Owner-occ
- 87.3%
- For sale
- 0
See the record →
Linnen Place
29466 · Built 2010–13
- Doors
- 75
- Owner-occ
- 62.7%
- For sale
- 0
See the record →
Porchers Preserve
29466 · Built 2015–16
- Doors
- 50
- Owner-occ
- 92%
- For sale
- 0
See the record →
Owner-occupancy, tenure and turnover across the seven
Every one of the 3,481 homes in these seven Mount Pleasant neighborhoods was matched to its Charleston County parcel record, one at a time. The table below is what those recorded deeds say: what share of each neighborhood is owner-occupied, how long the current owners have held, and how often homes there change hands.
| Neighborhood | Homes matched | Owner-occupancy | Median tenure | Annual turnover | Built | For sale now |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snee Farm | 1,081 | 86.5% | 7.3 yrs | 4.5% | 1971–89 | 24 |
| Brickyard Plantation | 821 | 92.7% | 9.2 yrs | 3.2% | 1992–07 | 6 |
| Hamlin Plantation | 857 | 90.8% | 7.1 yrs | 4.3% | 2000–17 | 12 |
| Oyster Point | 542 | 82.8% | 6.1 yrs | 5.4% | 2013–20 | 4 |
| Moore's Landing | 55 | 87.3% | 3.6 yrs | 10% | 2021–23 | 0 |
| Linnen Place | 75 | 62.7% | 4.1 yrs | 2.7% | 2010–13 | 0 |
| Porchers Preserve | 50 | 92% | 8 yrs | 2% | 2015–16 | 0 |
Deed figures as of August 25, 2026. “For sale now” is active MLS listings checked 2026-09-03 and moves daily; the deed columns move with the county record, which is a different clock.
How these numbers were produced
Charleston County publishes a parcel layer carrying, for every property, its last recorded transfer and whether the owner claims it as a legal residence. Each of these seven subdivisions was resolved to a set of parcels by seeding from the assessor's own subdivision codes where they exist, rejecting geographic outliers, buffering the resulting envelope, and then classifying every street inside it against the assessor's neighborhood codes. The roster was re-sampled afterwards to check the match.
The known failure case:assessor subdivision tags cover only three of the seven cleanly, and one — Brickyard — has four tagged parcels sitting roughly fifteen miles apart, which would expand its envelope to most of the county if taken at face value. Laurel Hill Plantation is filed inside Brickyard's code family and was excluded by hand, which is why Brickyard reads 821 parcels against the HOA's own published 825.
What this is not:the county layer stores each parcel's most recent transfer only. A figure here describes the people who own these homes now — not a time series of what the neighborhood sold for, and not a price index.
Owner-occupancy, tenure and length-of-ownership statistics are also published at broader geographies by the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey and are sold at parcel level by national data vendors. What is unusual here is the join: published per subdivision, matched parcel by parcel from recorded deeds, with the sample size shown and the failure cases named.
Compiled from Charleston County public property records (recorded deeds and assessor data), matched parcel-by-parcel to this neighborhood. Kept by Jim Deutsch, Charleston REALTOR®, eXp Realty LLC – Charleston (SC), SC License #102254. Aggregate statistics only — no individual property record is published. Equal Housing Opportunity.